3rd Conference
The Evolution of Language
April 3rd - 6th , 2000

Abstracts

 

 

Inheritance of language deficits in schizophrenia:
Relationship to the evolution of human linguistic ability

Lynn E DeLisi

Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Stony Brook
Stony Brook, New York 11794
LDeLisi@notes.cc.sunysb.edu

The language abilities of modern humans are thought to be clearly distinct from non-human primates (Bickerton, 1990). Crow (1997, 1998a) has proposed that language disturbance is central to the genetic etiology of schizophrenia and may be the critical characteristic in the evolution of Homo sapiens. Oral soliloquys have been analyzed from schizophrenic patients at the onset of their illness, controls and families with a high density of illness. Anomalies in Bickerton’s 5 distinctly human language devices were examined (sequential order, null elements, arguments of verbs, mechanisms for expansion and grammatical correctness) using a structured scoring format on the transcribed passages. Analyses show reduced use of clausal embedding in chronic patients that is not present at the time of the first-episode. These data are preliminary and need to be replicated in a larger sample of subjects. However, they are consistent with previous literature on language in patients with schizophrenia and further show that there is a familial component to these measures. Thus, these findings suggest that deficits in specifically human aspects of language may be related to the genetics of schizophrenia.

Background

Schizophrenia is a lifetime brain disorder expressed by thought, speech perception and organizational problems. It occurs in every human population (world-wide) and family, twin and adoption studies show a genetic predisposition for schizophrenia. Explanations for the thought and speech disorder of schizophrenia include that of (1) "dysfunctional executive control" (frontal lobe; e.g. Chaika, 1990; Morice,1995). (2) working/semantic memory deficits (e.g. Grove and Andreasen, 1985, Mortimer et al., 1995), and the extreme end of the variation in bilateral neural organization of the uniquely human components of language (Crow, 1998).

Bickerton (1990) proposes 5 unique characteristics of human language: (1) Differences in the superficial order of constituents, (2) use of null elements, (3) subcategorized argument structure of verbs, (4) mechanism for the expansion of utterances, and (5) grammatical items. It is hypothesized that the language disturbances of schizophrenia are related to defects in one or more of the uniquely human features of language and that the inheritance of the variation in these abilities is related to the inheritance of schizophrenia.

A relationship also exists between brain structural and functional asymmetries and both language abilities and schizophrenia (Corballis, 1991; Crow, 1998a; Geschwind and Galaburda, 1987). Furthermore, reduced functional asymmetry (hand skill) relate to reduced verbal ability (Crow et al., 1998). It has been proposed that the core clinical symptoms of schizophrenia relate to an underlying disorganization of language and its asymmetric perception and production (Crow, 1998b). Finally, some reduced posterior cerebral asymmetries present in schizophrenia are shown to be familial (DeLisi et al., 1997).

In previous studies (DeLisi et al., 1997; Shedlack et al., 1997) we found significantly more morphological errors and less clausal embedding in 1st episode patients compared with 52 controls. No associations were found with brain structural asymmetries. When ill and well members from 19 families with 2 or more siblings with schizophrenia were compared with 17 unrelated controls, soliloquys revealed that both ill and well siblings from these families had significantly less of one type of clausal embedding than controls, although the degree of embedding was not correlated within families and ill siblings did not have less embedding than their well siblings. The present study expands on our previous measures of language performance.

Methods

First-episode patients with schizophrenia, families with 2 or more siblings with schizophrenia and unrelated controls had their speech recorded and later transcribed (without punctuation) while an examiner asked each to use his/her imagination to describe what is happening in 7 pictures taken from the Thematic Aptitude Test (TAT). These pictures ranged from disturbing emotional scenes to tranquil scenery.

The following are examples of responses to two disturbing scenes, ones which tended to stipmulate more disorganized responses from patients.

"…I’m afraid to say something lude but it could connotate that be a grandfather coming in to touch his precious grand pre-post pubsescent granddaughter and yet he has sorta of a halo around him so it could be an angel or maybe I am saying that because there was a chance I was sexually abused which I have been exploring in the last year or two the innocent part of me says its an angel visiting the virgin Mary and the other part of me says its incest the beginning of an incestral relationship that has been going on for a while and not nervous so I’m alittle upset looking at that one…"

 

"…it looks like he is tired he wants to go to bed he’s tired I guess he has his hand over his face like he is really tired and he is aggravated he could be aggravated he is just getting up out of bed putting his clothes on getting out of bed getting something to drink or something he could be getting up to go to work in the morning you know his wife or his girlfriend is sleeping or maybe the wife dies or something he probably is going to go to work…"

In addition , each subject was asked to describe the steps taken to get up in the morning and get ready for an appointment, from waking-up to arrival at the destination (sequential ability).

Laterality was assessed by (1) a hand use questionaire (Annett 1967) and (2) by a relative hand-skill timed "dot" test (Tapley and Bryden, 1985). The following items were scored: total # of words, total # of sentences, SYNTAX: Order (# of awkward sentences, # with incorrect word order), # of null elements, # sentences missing arguments to verbs, mechanisms for expansion (# of conjoined clauses and # embedded, # grammatical mistakes, SEMANTICS: Misuse of Words (#), neologisms (#), MISCELLANEOUS: Appropriateness of content and logical order to sequential task and amount of detail.

Two separate 2-way ANOVA’s were performed (1) For the 1st epsode cases compared to chronic patients and controls covarying sex and age (2) For the 12 families only: with sex, diagnosis and family membership as factors, covarying for age.

 

1st Episode Patients

Chronic Patients

Controls

F(Dx)=

p<

 

Mean +/-SD (N=9)

(N=29)

(N=12)

 

 

Dependent Variable

 

 

 

 

 

Age

23.4+/-5

33.8+/-8

32.6+/-7

 

 

#Words

594+/-406

530+/-267

862+/-514

3.21

0.05

# Awkward Sentences

2.7+/-3

3.3+/-4

1.8+/-1

0.61

0.55

# Incorrect Order

0.3+/-.7

0.3+/-.9

0

1.23

0.30

# Null Elements

6.8+/-5

6.2+/-4

11.0+/-8

0.46

0.64

# Grammatical Mistakes

1.8+/-2

1.3+/-2

0.9+/-2

1.50

0.24

# Missing Arguments

2.0+/-2

1.1+/-2

0.9+/-1

0.31

0.73

# Conjoined Clauses

29.9+/-24

20.2+/-16

45.8+/-27

5.92

0.005

# Embedded Clauses

6.9+/-7

5.6+/-5

12.2+/-12

2.68

0.08

Misuse of Words

0.44+/-.5

0.38+/-.6

0.17+/-.4

0.54

0.59

Neologisms

0

0.14+/-.6

0

0.30

0.75

Poor Over All Content

11%

41%

0

3.32

0.05

Vagueness

33%

28%

0

2.11

0.13

Sentences Lack Connectivity

22%

14%

0

0.95

0.39

Incomplete Sentences

44%

38%

8%

1.09

0.35

Numerous False Starts

22%

35%

25%

0.80

0.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sequential Task

 

 

 

 

 

Poor Content

20%

46%

9%

1.44

0.25

Poor Order

20%

50%

18%

1.43

0.25

 

 

 

 

 

 

Handedness (#R)

80%

96%

100%

0.60

0.55

Handskill (R/L)

1.3+/-.6

1.3+/-.4

1.3+/-.3

0.30

0.74

Note: There were no significant sex or sex by diagnosis effects.

Table 1. Unrelated Patients vs. Controls

 

Family

 

Diagnosis

 

 

 

F=

(p<)

F=

(p<)

 

Dependent Variable

 

 

 

 

 

# Words

1.44

0.31

0.74

0.42

 

# Awkward Sentences

0.89

0.59

0.46

0.52

 

# Incorrect Order

0.58

0.80

0.94

0.36

 

# Null Elements

7.87

0.006

0.04

0.84

 

# Grammatical Mistakes

1.08

0.48

0.22

0.66

 

# Missing Arguments

0.19

0.99

0.06

0.82

 

# Conjoined Clauses

3.42

0.05

1.03

0.34

 

# Embedded Clauses

5.19

0.01

1.28

0.30**

 

Misuse of Words

0.84

0.62

3.17

0.12

 

Poor Over All Content

0.88

0.59

0.20

0.66

 

Vagueness

0.68

0.73

1.22

0.30

 

Sentence Connectivity

1.48

0.30

0.23

0.65

 

Incomplete Sentences

5.13

0.01

0.13

0.73

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sequential Task

 

 

 

 

 

Poor Content

5.86

0.01

0.12

0.74

 

Logical

0.31

0.95

0.62

0.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Handedness

1.20

0.43

0.002

0.97

 

Handskill

0.51

0.83

0.01

0.91

 

**A significant family by diagnosis effect covarying for total # of words was present for embedded clauses (F=5.87, p=0.02).

Table 2. 12 families with 2 siblings, both of whom are diagnosed with schizophrenia (ill and well relatives compared and a within versus among family analysis performed.

Results

Table 1 summarizes the data on the 1st episode patients compared with controls, while table 2 summarizes the family data. Reduced percentages of conjoined and a trend for reduced embedded clauses were present in the schizophrenic patient groups compared with controls.

Summary

The Characteristic thought disorder present in patients with schizophrenia can be shown to be linguistically deviant. Particularly, chronic patients (ill for at least a few years) had reduced use of conjoined and embedded clauses in their speech, used fewer words overall, more inappropriate content and less connectivity between sentences, than controls. A lack of detectable language abnormalities at the time of the 1st episode suggests progressive development after the onset of illness. In addition, a familial basis for clausal mechanisms of expansion is suggested from analyses of the above families.

Thus, the uniquely human aspects of language, particularly mechanisms for expansion are shown to be reduced in patients with schizophrenia and also shown to be familial and related to illness within families.

References

Annett M (1967) The binomial distribution of right, mixed, and left handedness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19: 327-333.

Bear DM, Schiff D, Saver J, Greenberg M, Freeman R (1986) Quantitative analysis of cerebral asymmetry; fronto-occipital correlation, sexual dimorphism and association with handedness. Archives of Neurology 43: 598-603.

Bickerton D (1990) Language and Species, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

Chaika EO (1990) Understanding Psychotic Speech. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Illinois

Corballis MC (1991) The Lopsided Ape: Evolution of the Generative Mind, Oxford University Press.

Crow TJ (1997) Is schizophrenia the price that Homo sapiens pays for language? Schizophrenia Research 28: 127-141.

Crow TJ (1998a) Sexual selection, timing and the descent of man: A theory of the genetic origins of language. Current Psychology of Cognition 17: 1079-1114.

Crow TJ (1998b) Nuclear schizophrenia symptoms as a window on the relationship between thought and speech. British J of Psychiatry 173: 303-309.

Crow TJ, Crow LR, Done DJ, Leask SJ (1998) Relative hand skill predicts academic ability: global deficits at the point of hemispheric indecision. Neuropsychologia, in press.

DeLisi LE (1997) Is schizophrenia a lifetime disorder of brain plasticity, growth and aging? Schizophrenia Research 23: 119-129.

DeLisi LE, Sakuma M, Kushner M, Finer DL, Hoff AL, Crow TJ (1997) Anomalous cerebral asymmetry and language processing in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 23: 255-271.

Geschwind N, Galaburda AM (1987) Cerebral Lateralization, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Grove WM, Andreasen NC (1985) Language and thinking in psychosis. Is there an input abnormality? Archives of General Psychiatry 42: 26-32.

Morice R (1995) Language impairments and executive dysfunction in schizophrenia. In: Speech and Language Disorders in Psychiatry (A Sims, editor), Gaskell Press, pp. 57-69.

Mortimer A, Corridan B, Rudge S, Kho K, Kelly F, Bristow M, Hodges J (1995) Thought, speech and language disorder and semantic memory in schizophrenia. In: Speech and Language Disorders in Psychiatry (A Sims, editor), Gaskell Press, pp. 70-80.

Shedlack K, Lee G, Sakuma M, Xie S-H, Kushner M, Pepple J, Fineer DL, Hoff AL, DeLisi LE (1997) Language processing and memory in ill and well siblings from multiplex families affected with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 25: 43-52.

Tapley S and Bryden M (1985) A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands. Neuropsychologia 23: 215-221.

 

 

 Conference site: http://www.infres.enst.fr/confs/evolang/